Compare the strengths and limitations of the Web Parts
It’s important that you understand the strengths and limitations of the two Web Parts because if you choose the wrong one, your site could run into performance problems. You can use both Web Parts to show content that is based on a query. In a simplified world, here’s how you can decide between the two:
· Use the CQWP when you have a limited amount of content, your query is simple, and you don’t expect your content to grow much in the future.
· Use the CSWP in all other scenarios when you want to show content that is based on a query.
The table below gives a comparison of the two Web Parts:
Web Part behavior
|
Content Query Web Part
|
Content Search Web Part
|
Query configuration
|
Easy
|
You’ll need to know about certain search features such as managed properties.
|
Query across large amounts of content
|
Limited
|
Yes
|
Handle complex queries
|
Limited
|
Yes
|
Scale to handle future content growth
|
Limited
|
Yes
|
Display content from other site collections
|
No
|
Yes (see section below)
|
Design of query results can be customized
|
Yes, by using XSLT.
|
Yes, by using HTML.
|
Maintenance cost in a complex site architecture
|
High
|
Small (see section below)
|
Narrow down the query results that are displayed in the Web Part
|
No
|
Yes, in combination with the Refinement Web Part.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment